When The British Copy The Japanese, Things Get Ugly
Twins?
By Gunnar Heinrich
READING two somber reviews recently that focused on Jaguar’s XF got me to thinking that it’s been some time since anything has been written on the midsize cat, herein.
When I found the above picture posted on ThePassionatePursuit.com, I knew it’s been far too long.
But let’s come back to that later and first discuss some other recently published pictures.
In their melancholic review, The New York Times did post some appealing [P.R. sourced] shots of one XF sedan finished in Blue-Hair blue. Some might be given to calling the paint’s color “Calypso” but I think that’s being charitable.
Regardless, some angles of the cat that hasn’t ever crawled out from its conceptual forebear’s shadow show traces of elegance and even sport. That rounded roof line that summits before the B-pillar and then gently slopes into a short boot is, true to Jaguar form, graceful.
The muscular hood is another fine aspect of art that managed to sneak its way past Ford’s ugly mill. There’s ample surface tension present and the central power dome suggests that this car did plenty of lap time at the Nurburgring.
But that’s where the excitement ends.
FRUMPY
The XF looks as everyday common as the Ford Five Hundred Taurus. And when the high gamma, PhotoShopped images give way to the bargain lot shots that trickle in on Ebay, more people will get a very clear picture of how frumpy the Jag really looks.
And now back to you the aforementioned image up top that shows the eerily similar profiles of the Jaguar XF and Lexus GS.
The image is sourced from ThePassionatePursuit.com (a nicely done blog, by the way) to Le Blog Auto whose people rightly observed that the production model XF had a little too much in common with its competition.
To rip one off of Sammy Davis, Jr., I’d say their too close for comfort.
TWINS
From the five spoke rims, to the angled lens of the headlamps, to the door sills, bulky rearview mirrors, triangular C-pillars – you name it – this is an example of severe design overlap.
Was it corporate espionage?
Or a tryst between designers in rival departments that led to one copying another?
Or are Lexus and Jaguar plotting to mainstream a joint design of the Vanilla executive sedan in an effort to woo Acura RL drivers?
Hard to say for sure. But what isn’t is to know that when the British copy the Japanese, things do get ugly.
[Linked: NYT | ThePassionatePursuit.com]


steane | May 7, 2008 | Reply
Gunnar – are you baiting me
You know I have to play devils advocate here…
I agree that in side profile these two cars appear very similar, in fact there was much talk about this when the production XF first hit the web – but while they share a similar profile they have very different characters and even in profile there is a lot to separate them.
The Lexus is uninspiring while the XF has way more poise, a rear that has a hint of Aston and IMO it just looks waaaay better than the Lexus, any current BMW and at least the equal of anything in the MB and Audi range.
The majority of road tests that I have read claim that it is an excellent drive. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – this car will singlehandedly save Jaguar.
If I was shopping in this market I wouldn’t think twice about buying one – with the supercharged V8 thanks.
I almost feel guilty…
Jim | May 7, 2008 | Reply
Acura RL drivers, plural? Where? They’re as rare as that woodpecker in the Arkansas swamp.
gunnar | May 7, 2008 | Reply
They’re practically identical from the side, Steane!
Unbelievable how Jaguar could let this happen – too funny really.
I’m still looking for that “hint of Aston”…
Jim > That was a beautiful comparo. Brought on a tear…