RSS

Eye on Design: Lambo/Ferrari Role Reversal?

ferrari v lamborghini

by Gunnar Heinrich ::: Ferrari v. Lamborghini

RICHARD Wolf and I have been having a discussion lately on Italian car design.

Loyal to his E39 generation frosty blue M5, Richard’s quick to call a spade what it is and even quicker to pounce on what he sees as bad design. When his baby was in the shop for cosmetic touch ups recently, he shared his displeasure in having to bear the weight of driving a retrotastic Dodge Challenger, “the essence of cheap,” he said.

Sorry to confirm, he was right about the Challenger.

And he’s right about what he sees as the trend in Lamborghini and Ferrari design. To Richard’s keen eye, it seems the two car makers have switched roles. Thirty years ago, the Lamborghini Countach was wild and wildly flamboyant to its core. Complicated, over-the-top design that was more provocative than beautiful was Lambo’s raison d’ĂȘtre. NACA ducts met Stealth bomber wings. It’s as though Lambo had an inside guy in the US Airforce.

Ferrari, on the other hand, was the quintessence of restraint. Symphonic, yet subtle curves were the Boxer’s forte. And even the wild Testarossa made certain geometric sense in its iconic horizontal air slats and gently wedged profile. Ferrari was wild, yet paradoxically the more conservative of the two exotics.

Today, German management at Lamborghini has rerouted and trained the raging bull on being both sharp, clean, almost too efficient. Consider the Gallardo, a masterpiece of minimalist edge and clean surfacing. Ditto for the Murcielago and even the wildly imaginative Reventon – whose cleaved angles are all brilliantly purposed.

Ferrari on the other hand has grown fat- as if overly content with its own largesse. No longer lean, contemporary Ferraris seem like heavier GTs that are taking an ungainly focus on creature comforts. Taking their eyes off the prize as it were, the classically beautiful lines are gone for bold but ultimately tone deaf styling cliches.

It’s as though Maranello’s external sheetmetal seems oddly at the mercy of wind tunnel shaping and the whims of auto stylists who’ve abandoned taste.

The “low-cost” California is emblematic of this shaky route to excess at the expense of beauty. It’s high, fussy boot with vertical quad exhausts recalls not so much Ferrari as it does Fiat.

In another thirty years, if we’re still driving exotics, it’ll be interesting to note whether Ferrari and Lamborghini maintain their current trends. For now, we have to marvel at the role reversal.

July 08, 2010
Share

About the Author: Gunnar Heinrich is publisher of Automobiles De Luxe online and is executive producer of the Automobiles De Luxe Television series on PBS member station CPTV.

. . .

Filed Under: FERRARILAMBORGHINI

Tags:

. . .

RSSComments: 3  |  Opine Freely, But Smartly.  |  Trackback URL

  1. Philiosophy of sportscars. Were between the Caparo or Atom and the Veyron do you want to slot in? How much daily practicability do you design for?

    Ferrari seems a little bit too prolific, bringing along the need for new designs all the time. That California sure is a design disaster, a cash machine aimed at the wannabe crowd. But the 458 is veeery nice (having driven it), and that 599 GTO also (judging from videos). Looking back, Ferraris started as massive GT cars. Only around 1970 they went for the “runabout” sports market.

    Lambo is more focused on the pure sports car with a minimum of daily usability now. No need to ask themselves how much GT should be in their sports cars. But then in reality they have only a single model, and a singular philosophy of what their cars should be. Makes it easier. Ferrari is spread wider.

  2. Excellent points Distiller. Very cool re: your time behind the Italia. Have to ask though, fast GTs – isn’t that what Maserati’s for?

  3. Well, my Italia time was only a little more than half an hour. A friend of a friend … And half of that stuck in traffic. :-)

    Maserati. Hmm. Grand marque and great example of once you gone downmarket you never come back.
    But talking about the presence: In my mind Ferrari and Maserati under one hat is not the most natural cohabitation. If Fiat sees Maserati positioned below Ferrari, then the California wears the wrong badge. And the California would better have been used as 3200/4200GT replacement (executed as seperate coupĂ© and fabric drop-top!!), instead of using the large QPorte as basis for the GranTurismo. In short I’m not sure if Ferrari really knows what to do with Maserati.

Trackbacks: 1  |  Trackback URL

  1. From Eye on Design: Lambo/Ferrari Role Reversal? | Automobiles De Luxe … | ferraridrivers.info on Jul 8, 2010

RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL